http://jstvz.org/categories/open_access/ Recent content in Open_access on jstvz.org Hugo -- gohugo.io en-US Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 http://jstvz.org/posts/2013-01-31-success-without-glamour-nih/ Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 http://jstvz.org/posts/2013-01-31-success-without-glamour-nih/ Background See yesterday’s post about publications in Cell, Nature, and Science (CNS). During the discussion on Twitter Ethan Perlstein noted: @james_estevez @mbeisen NSF and NIH are two different tribes. Much more glamorphilia among NIH-funded academics — Ethan Perlstein (@eperlste) January 30, 2013 and also: @eperlste @mbeisen Sure. Data set for F32 is much larger, ~1300, so it’ll run overnight. — James Estevez (@james_estevez) January 30, 2013 So, lets repeat the analysis. http://jstvz.org/posts/2013-01-30-success-without-glamour-nsf-biology-postdoctoral-fellows-fy2012/ Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 http://jstvz.org/posts/2013-01-30-success-without-glamour-nsf-biology-postdoctoral-fellows-fy2012/ Background So there was a discussion on Twitter, started by Michael Eisen using the hashtag #SuccessWithoutGlamour discussing the necessity of publishing in the Big Three journals (CNS, or Cell, Nature, and Science). Heartening responses, but I suspected there might be some selection bias and decided to take a marginally more quantitative look. Data I thought this poster by Priem and colleagues was interesting and took it as a starting point (Priem, Costello, and Dzuba 2012).